Dawkins is deluded in sillyness of the suggestion that God had a beginning because he did. Just because a chicken is hatched does not mean that all creatures are hatched, especially if the species is different, and especially when this being is the author of all. In this, I think that the application logic (if there is any) is totally and entirely misconceived. His condescension of faith, Christ and the ultimate sacrifice paid, reveals his concern and uneasiness about eternity. For if a man knows something to be true, he is sure by it’s knowingness. But, Dawkins is unsure and that is why he seeks to prove or proof of his nonsense Theory.
Dawkins is deluded in sillyness of the suggestion that God had a beginning because he did. Just because a chicken is hatched does not mean that all creatures are hatched, especially if the species is different, and especially when this being is the author of all. In this, I think that the application logic (if there is any) is totally and entirely misconceived. His condescension of faith, Christ and the ultimate sacrifice paid, reveals his concern and uneasiness about eternity. For if a man knows something to be true, he is sure by it’s knowingness. But, Dawkins is unsure and that is why he seeks to prove or proof of his nonsense Theory.