After the video showing Planned Parenthood selling baby parts emerged, Planned Parenthood published its own video denying the allegations.
Now another video has been released showing a different Planned Parenthood executive wrangling over the price of baby parts. Once again, “intact” parts are at a premium, necessitating the application of a “less crunchy technique” when murdering the baby.
Who would have thought that ‘the silent scream’ was crying out for a Lamborghini?
Not with a boot full of its own baby parts-for-profit!
How do you respond to this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/22/opinion/the-campaign-of-deception-against-planned-parenthood.html
I can understand being profoundly against abortion. I’m not exactly comfortable with the practice myself. But you don’t have to be mendacious about it, surely?
This may also be of interest (it’s not terribly well written, but the point is interesting):
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/slacktivist/2015/07/15/its-not-gullibility-its-malice-c-s-lewis-is-right-and-ed-stetzer-is-wrong/
The NY times article is more or less what I would expect from them: they have their own perspective and bias (as do I). They seem more incensed by the means of data collection than by the data itself.
I was aware of the C. S. Lewis quote mentioned in the Patheos blog. I think Lewis is right; we all have a fallen nature and a tendency to act the way he describes.
The video shows no respect for human life. Human life is sacred.