From Imam Rauf:

Mr. Rauf argued radical extremists had “hijacked” the debate over the relationship between the West and Islam, then stunned many in the audience by suggesting one way to reduce ill feeling toward Muslims was to order a “media blackout” of coverage of suicide bombers.

Censorship of Islamist atrocities: yes, that should do it.

From John Stackhouse an evangelical theologian who thinks Rauf is a “moderate”, that he should go ahead and build it and that everyone else concentrate on more important things:

Controversy continues to rage over whether moderate Muslims should build, and should be allowed to build, a mosque or a community centre near Ground Zero in New York City. (Yes, they’re moderate: I have met the imam in question, Feisal Abdul Rauf, and his wife, Daisy Khan, who also leads the project. They are just what intelligent, sensible people would want in Muslim leaders: affable, well-informed, well-spoken, serious, convinced, and committed to good relationships with their neighbours of every stripe.)

Stackhouse does little to bolster his credentials as a judge of character by adding:

I’m a Christian. In fact, I’m an evangelical Christian. Am I implicated in the shooting of abortion doctors? Am I implicated in the policies of the Harper government here or the Bush administration recently gone? Am I implicated in whatever James Dobson or Pat Robertson or Franklin Graham or Benny Hinn says? If so, then I’m a pretty dangerous guy.

How did Harper, Bush, Dobson etc. get lumped into the same category as the murderers of abortion doctors?  How is James Dobson dangerous? Why were Jimmy Carter, Barack Obama or Jeremiah Wright not on the list? Presumably because it’s a list of the political right which, in Stackhouse-land is, a priori, tainted.

From someone who has the appearance of being a genuinely moderate Muslim speaking on a US news program this morning – I didn’t catch his name, unfortunately – who made the blindingly simple and obvious observation that if the majority in the US (the number is around 70%) opposes the ground zero mosque, why would Muslims want to further alienate them by going ahead and building it? He said it should be moved.

From here:

The imam in the middle of the Ground Zero mosque controversy said Sunday he would never have picked that location if he knew it would create the conflict it did, but he has no plan to move the Islamic center from the proposed site two blocks from where the World Trade Center fell.

“I would never have done it. I’m a man of peace. I mean, the whole — the whole objective of peace work is not to do something that would provoke controversy,” said Imam Feisel Abdul Rauf.

This, of course, means that Rauf is either an idiot or a liar. I don’t think he is an idiot.