The exceptional hypocrisy of Primate Fred Hiltz

In his Presidential Address at General Synod, Fred Hiltz exhibited exceptional hypocrisy when he said this about the oversight provided by bishops in the Global South and Africa to North American Anglicans unwilling to acquiesce to the maniacally deviant attitudes of their Provinces on homosexuality:

I maintain and have publicly declared my belief that those interventions have created more havoc in the Church, resulting in schism, than any honest and transparent theological dialogue on issues of sexuality through due synodical process in dioceses and in the General Synod.

What he left out was the fact that the “interventions” were precipitated not by the “dialogue” on homosexuality, but by the actions of so many dioceses who are vigorously pursuing the blessing of same-sex unions; Fred even listed them elsewhere in the synod – it’s a long list.

Moreover, the “havoc” is now being perpetuated by the ACoC which, in its determination to hang on to property, has adopted the scorched earth policy of suing every parish that has joined ANiC and wishes to remain in its building.

General Synod: an afternoon off

Time does not move at the same pace in all circumstances: 3 days of Synod are the equivalent of 3 weeks of ordinary time. Part of the problem is that Anglicans love to talk, especially when they have nothing to say.

So I was very glad for a break: this afternoon we drove down the coast to Peggy’s Cove. What I didn’t know was that the Anglican Synod had moved to Exhibition Park  – not far from Peggy’s Cove – for their afternoon shindig. Consequently, the closer we got to Peggy’s Cove, the denser the fog became until, by the time we arrived, we could barely see anything. Then the rain started.

The theme for Synod is nautical “Feeling the Winds of God: Charting a New Course”, so each day begins with the sound of a ship’s horn; at least, I thought that’s what it was. Now I realise it’s a foghorn.

Even in the fog, which would you rather look at, this:

Or this:

The Anglican Church of Canada General Synod 2010. The beginning.

Notes from the Underground.

Holy Post has published a variation on this article. Also Eternity Magazine.

I am in Halifax, Nova Scotia attending the 2010 General Synod of the Anglican Church of Canada.

Every 3 years clergy and lay people from all over the country meet to discuss and set church policy; one of most pressing items on the agenda is the decline in church membership.

In 1961, 1.3 million people attended an Anglican Church; in 2001, 658,000 attended and in 2009 325,000. A simple 3 point graph shows that, if nothing changes, by around 2040 there will be 1 person left. A 3 point graph may not yield the most accurate predictions, but one thing is abundantly clear: in Canada the Anglican Church is in rapid decline.

That is why the Church has begun a program to revitalise itself: Vision 2019 – Where do you want the church to be by 2019. A consulting company was employed to poll the faithful; the number of people who responded (around 1000) was disappointing and the results vague. But, then, perhaps the only consistent answer that could realistically be expected from such a poll is “in 2019, we want the church to be still in existence”. The cynical might think that too ambitious.

Another recurrent – obsessive even – theme will be the blessing of same-sex unions. In this synod, a valiant attempt is being made to circumvent the heated arguments normally generated by this topic. Rather than the free-for-all debates that few look forward to, delegates will be meeting in small groups to shape (or manipulate, depending on your perspective) resolutions which will then be passed to the floor.

The Church is trying to maintain a delicate balance: on the one hand it has been apparent for well over a decade that the intent of the Anglican leadership is to convince Canadian Anglicans that same-sex attraction is God-given and, therefore, active same-sex partnerships are holy and entirely consistent with Christian principles. On the other hand, there are over 60 million Anglicans that don’t agree and want Anglican provinces like Canada and the US booted out of the Anglican club. It looks as if the finesse that will be attempted at this synod is to squash motions that would publically commit the whole Canadian church to the blessing of same sex unions. Instead, synod will push for the local option: dioceses and churches that want to proceed can do so – the decision will be delegated down. Even the most naive will be able to see through this ruse, of course: get those who work for you to make the tough decisions so you can’t be held accountable.

The third important item on the agenda is whether to sign the Anglican Covenant, a document that commits signatories to consulting the worldwide Anglican Communion before making major decision.

The synod is taking place between June 3rd and June 11th. I am writing a live blog of the goings–on the AEC blog and also posting my impressions of the continuing discussions here.

Normally wild horses could not drag me to spend a week witnessing the meanderings of 400 Anglicans ruminating on the state of the church. However, as a conservative Anglican blogger, when I first applied to attend Synod, I detected subtle intimations that my presence would not be a cause for rejoicing; what greater incentive to come could I have asked for?

Stay tuned for more news as the week unfolds.

David Jenkins blogs at anglicansamizdat.com

The Anglican Church of Canada’s nuclear resolution

Is here:

A181: Toward a World Free of Nuclear Weapons
Subject: Toward a World Free of Nuclear Weapons

Moved by: The Rev. Canon Dr. William E. Prentice, Diocese of Ottawa

Seconded by: The Rev. Dr. Linda Privitera, Diocese of Ottawa

Be it resolved that this General Synod:

Expresses its support for a world free of nuclear weapons, and asks the General Secretary to convey our position to the Government of Canada, requesting:

  1. from the Government information about Canadian activities in the last three years to support nuclear disarmament, and
  2. from the Prime Minister a public affirmation of Canada’s commitment to a world free of nuclear weapons.

Source Partners in Mission and Ecojustice Committee

BREAKING NEWS: world leaders are hailing the call by Canadian Anglicans to get rid of nuclear weapons as an innovative and thoroughly brilliant way to avert the possibility of nuclear holocaust.

Vladimir Putin, slapping himself on the forehead, said, “How could we have missed this? Of course, we will start disarming right away”. Barack Obama didn’t even have to read from the teleprompter as he exclaimed, “After this, I myself am thinking of becoming an Anglican; we have already started shipping our nuclear arsenal to Canada for safe disposal.”

The Anglican Church of Canada’s resolution on the Covenant

This will be discussed at the General Synod in Halifax next week:

A137: Anglican Communion Covenant

Be it resolved that this General Synod:

  1. receive the final text of The Covenant for the Anglican Communion;
  2. request that materials be prepared under the auspices of the Anglican Communion Working Group, for parishes and dioceses in order that study and consultation be undertaken on The Covenant for the Anglican Communion;
  3. direct the Council of General Synod, after this period of consultation and study, to bring a recommendation regarding adoption of the Covenant for the Anglican Communion to the General Synod of 2013.

What does the Anglican Church of Canada do when someone tries to pin it down with a wet noodle?

Receive the wet noodle; circulate the wet noodle to parishes for close inspection; shelve the wet noodle for 3 years in the hope that it might become more flaccid. Repeat as necessary.

Katherine Jefferts Schori to attend GS2010

Katherine Jefferts Schori will be attending the Anglican Church of Canada’s General Synod in June. I wonder if she’ll bring her Rainbow Add an ImageHat as a subtle reminder to us Canucks what it’s really all about.

Synod members will welcome a number of international guests including The Right Rev. Suheil Dawani, Anglican Bishop in Jerusalem; The Most Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori, Presiding Bishop and Primate of The Episcopal Church

The Anglican Covenant at the Canadian GS2010

The ACoC has a document to help attendees prepare for the General Synod 2010 discussion – or waffle – on the Anglican Covenant. Read it all here. Section 4 of the Covenant is the potentially contentious part, since it seeks to reign in Provinces such as TEC and the ACoC that have decided to go their own way on issues like same-sex blessings. Conservatives complain that section 4 has no teeth and liberals that it interferes with matters that are internal to a Province. It has no teeth.

In Section Four, affirmations and commitments are offered relating to processes and principles that should be followed in situations of conflict between provinces. The particular issues of potential or present conflict are not named, and the processes laid out work within the present structures of the Anglican Consultative Council, with the standing committee of that council serving as the mediating agent. The standing committee’s power is only to recommend courses of relational consequences to the council’s own constitutionally formed processes.

Member churches of the Anglican Consultative Council are invited to enter into this covenanted relationship, which makes tangible affirmations and commitments about our common heritage, participation in God’s mission, and mutual responsibility in the bonds of affection. When a situation of conflict arises, churches are enjoined to seek the mind of Christ, and the affirmations and commitments in Sections One, Two and Three provide tools for discerning dialogue. The possible outcomes cannot be predicted. Common mind may include, for example, the agreement to disagree on a particular issue, but to keep walking together. What is clear is that Section Four does not supplant the existing authorities, the canons and constitutions of provinces, or the constitution of the Anglican Consultative Council.

So to summarise the document’s preparation for discussing section 4:

  • If a Province breaks the Covenant, the consequences are “relational” resulting, no doubt, in a severe scolding.
  • If there is disagreement after signing the Covenant we’ll have some “discerning dialogue”. TEC and the ACoC have had a lot of practise at this: each could single-handedly bore the balls off a buffalo, let alone shrivel the resolve of all but the most hardy opposition.
  • If TEC and the ACoC fail to subdue the enemy by focussed, concentrated magniloquence, then the “common mind” simply changes its meaning to “we disagree”. Black is white, up is down, and so begins another normal day in the ACoC.
  • Who cares anyway because section 4 has no teeth.