Global warming is making things colder

When I had my annual Christmas chat with a friend in the UK, he mentioned that where he lives in South Wales the temperature has been hovering around -20 degrees C, colder than he ever remembers. Naturally, colder winters are due to global warming – that’s why it’s called global warming.

Scientific evidence for anthropogenic global warming isn’t as convincing as, say, the empirical evidence that the earth isn’t flat; if it were that simple, everyone but the most obdurate contrarian would believe it.

What is in little doubt, though, is that politics plays a significant part in global warming hysteria.

From here:

The Abiding Faith Of Warm-ongers

Got that? No matter what the weather, it’s all due to warming. This isn’t science; it’s a kind of faith. Scientists go along and even stifle dissent because, frankly, hundreds of millions of dollars in research grants are at stake. But for the believers, global warming is the god that failed.

Why do we continue to listen to warmists when they’re so wrong? Maybe it’s because their real agenda has nothing to do with climate change at all. Earlier this month, attendees of a global warming summit in Cancun, Mexico, concluded, with virtually no economic or real scientific support, that by 2020 rich nations need to transfer $100 billion a year to poor nations to help them “mitigate” the adverse impacts of warming.

This is what global warming is really about — wealth redistribution by people whose beliefs are basically socialist. It has little or nothing to do with climate. If it did, we might pay more attention to Piers Corbyn, a little-known British meteorologist and astrophysicist who has a knack for correctly predicting weather changes. Indeed, as London’s Mayor Boris Johnson recently noted, “He seems to get it right about 85% of the time.”

How does he do it? Unlike the U.N. and government forecasters, Corbyn pays close attention to solar cycles that, as it turns out, correlate very closely to changes in climate. Not only are we not headed for global warming, Corbyn says, we may be entering a “mini ice age” similar to the one that took place from 1450 A.D. to 1850 A.D.

We don’t know if Corbyn’s right or not. But given his record, he deserves as much attention as the warm-mongers whose goal is not to arrive at the truth but to reorganize society in a radical way.

Not even the weatherman believes in global warming

From here:

The founder of The Weather Channel in the US has described the concept of global warming as ‘the greatest scam in history’ and accused global media of colluding with ‘environmental extremists’ to alarm the public.

“It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM,” John Coleman wrote in an article published on ICECAP, the International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project, which is known for challenging widely published theories on global warming.

The World Council of Churches, having largely abandoned the Gospel in favour of almost anything that is sufficiently outlandish, is one of the dwindling numbers of organisations that is sufficiently gullible to cling tenaciously to the fantasy of anthropomorphic global warming.

Perhaps the member churches of the WCC have succumbed to nostalgia and, no longer believing in hellfire and damnation in the next life, feel they must preach it in this one.

h/t my underpaid research assistant

The WCC, global warming and the goddess Ixchel

The World Council of Churches was at the recent climate change conference in Cancun. With the perspicacity that we have come to expect from the WCC, they warn that, in spite of their best efforts, not only is time passing but appalling events are in the offing:

Time has run past. The problems and their challenges are still here. Scientific knowledge, supported by statistics and climatic models, as well as plain observations made by peasant, farmers, Indigenous peoples and coastal inhabitants has confirmed that the climate is changing because of human activities and that such change will prove disastrous for life in this planet, while we are still unable to take the unavoidable steps to detain the already tangible and oncoming appalling events.

As a small consolation for their lack of success in reversing the inexorable forward motion of the fourth dimension, during the opening ceremonies, the WCC would have been soothed by the ambience wafting from incantations to the Mayan jaguar goddess, Ixchel to whom virgins used to be sporadically sacrificed. I expect the WCC members felt safe enough.

More from here:

Who says that we live in a secular age? I’ll have you know that a recent U.N. climate change conference began with a prayer that the delegates would receive divine inspiration as they went about saving the planet.

Of course, the deity being prayed to was not the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ but, rather, a goddess who demanded regular sacrifices, including the occasional human one. Given what is going on at Cancun, this invocation seems oddly fitting.

The “invocation” was given by Christiana Figueres at the start of the conference in Cancun, Mexico. Perhaps inspired by the setting, Figueres invoked the Mayan goddess Ixchel.

Noting that Ixchel was the “goddess of reason, creativity and weaving,” Figueres “prayed” that the jaguar goddess would “inspire” the delegates.

This is the kind of self-parody that even the U.N.’s biggest critics couldn’t make up. Ixchel is often depicted as a “fierce hag” who, in her capriciousness, is just as likely to cause devastating floods as gentle rains that make crops grow.

Cancun Global warming hypocrisy

From here:

The climate change summit in Cancun will generate 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide, its Mexican hosts admitted last night.

That means the £43million event will produce as much greenhouse gas as an average-sized African country would over the same two-week period.

The figure includes the carbon generated by flights, transport, hotels and food – and means the conference is polluting at the same rate as Somalia or Mali.

The Anglican Church of Canada is doing its bit to contribute to the farce.

Global warming is not a problem: God said so

From here:

A Republican congressman hoping to chair the powerful House Energy Committee refers to the Bible and God on the issue of global warming.

Representative John Shimkus insists we shouldn’t concerned about the planet being destroyed because God promised Noah it wouldn’t happen again after the great flood.

Speaking before a House Energy Subcommittee on Energy and Environment hearing in March, 2009, Shimkus quoted Chapter 8, Verse 22 of the Book of Genesis.

He said: ‘As long as the earth endures, seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, will never cease.’

I have a lot of sympathy for Shimkus’ views: God is ultimately in control of what happens to the earth and man’s presumption of self determination is largely vanity. At the same time, although I think anthropological global warming is a hoax, I have enough of the hobbit in me to like green fields, woods, and meadows with wild flowers. Our world is filled with spectacular beauty: it is ours to enjoy, not despoil.

Americans supposedly confused by global warming

From here:

Though the majority of Americans believe that global warming is actually occurring, many do not understand the reasons behind it, suggests new research released Thursday.

According to a study by Yale University researchers, 63 per cent of U.S. citizens believe that global warming exists. However, only 57 per cent know what the greenhouse effect is and only 45 per cent recognize the impact of carbon dioxide in trapping the earth’s heat.

The greenhouse effect involves the trapping of the sun’s heat by gases in the earth’s atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane.

And 50 per cent of Americans understand that global warming is the result of human activities.

On the other hand, perhaps the average unwashed American just isn’t quite as gullible as his liberal betters would like him to be; rather like this physics professor:

For reasons that will soon become clear my former pride at being an APS [American Physical Society] Fellow all these years has been turned into shame, and I am forced, with no pleasure at all, to offer you my resignation from the Society.

It is of course, the global warming scam, with the (literally) trillions of dollars driving it, that has corrupted so many scientists, and has carried APS before it like a rogue wave. It is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist. Anyone who has the faintest doubt that this is so should force himself to read the ClimateGate documents, which lay it bare. (Montford’s book organizes the facts very well.) I don’t believe that any real physicist, nay scientist, can read that stuff without revulsion. I would almost make that revulsion a definition of the word scientist.

Global warming's tasteless propaganda

Most recently the splatter video, “No Pressure” had to be withdrawn because of complaints.

Before that, global warming alarmists tried to entice the doubtful into their fold with campaigns like these, produced by the ineptly named and grammatically nerve jarring Act Responsible advertising merchants:

Climate change evangelists blowing up the opposition

From here:

A British ad for a climate change campaign shows corporate workers, a famous soccer player and even school children being blown up for not agreeing to cut their carbon emissions, a blood-splattering display that has drawn anger from critics and sheepish embarrassment from its supporters.

The short film, “No Pressure,” which promotes the U.K.’s 10:10 climate change campaign, debuted on the campaign’s website Friday. It depicts a school teacher, a corporate boss and a soccer coach asking their respective students, employees and players to participate in the 10:10 campaign to reduce carbon emissions. Despite being told there is “no pressure” to join the cause, those who say they don’t plan to participate are immediately blown up by their superiors with the push of a button; the others are left standing in awe and covered in bloody remains.

he 10:10 campaign said that the video was intended to revive the issue of climate change in the media in a way that would make people laugh. To a degree, it said, it succeeded.

“Many people found the resulting film extremely funny, but unfortunately some didn’t and 10:10 would like to apologize to everybody who was offended by the film,” 10:10 said in a statement Friday.

It wasn’t extremely funny; for it to be extremely funny, it would have had to have had Lord Moncton blowing up Al Gore and David Suzuki.

Here is the less than extremely funny version:

Desmond Tutu distorting Christianity – again

Desmond Tutu spoke recently against one of liberal Christianity’s – using the word in its loosest possible sense – favourite whipping boys: globalism. Amidst the ritual bromidic meanderings on “equality”, the environment (did you know the Icelandic volcanic ash eruption was a result of our not working together – I didn’t) and greed,  we find this from African theologians Rev. Allan Boesak, and the Rev.  Johann Weusmann:

The Evangelical Reformed Church in Germany in 2007 embarked on a project to study the effects of globalization in the context of the Accra Confession, a 2004 statement of the then World Alliance of Reformed Churches that critiqued neoliberal economics. The German church worked with the church in South Africa to gain the perspective of a developing country.

Much of the “very activist” report, as Boesak described it, is devoted to economic issues, and is explicitly meant as ammunition in what is seen as the battle against the domination by a  financial elite using “empire logic.”

Just as Christ rose up against the Roman empire, it is the duty of Christians to resist the “lordless powers” of the global capitalist empire, the report says. It looks at issues such as the global food crisis, financial markets, ecology and militarism. It sets out a detailed programme for “breaking the dominance of financial markets over the real economy.”  The report distinguishes between globalization and globalism.

Have these theologians read the Bible? Any of it? Christ didn’t rise up against the Roman empire; some of his followers wanted him to; so did Satan in the three temptations in the wilderness (Matt 4:8-9). Nevertheless, he explicitly said his kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36).