Keeping Canadian airports safe from monolingualism

Canada’s language police are going undercover in eight airports to ensure that passengers will hear their flights are delayed in both English and French.

After these taxpayer funded linguistic stakeouts, monoglots will have absolutely no excuse for leaving their bags unattended.

From here:

Canada’s bilingualism watchdog is going undercover at eight major airports to see if travellers are served equally well in English and French.

Official Languages Commissioner Graham Fraser says his office will conduct more than 1,500 anonymous observations this fall at airports in Halifax, Quebec City, Montreal, Ottawa, Toronto, Winnipeg, Edmonton and Vancouver.

He says audits of some of those airports have been done in the past, but this will be the first time so many are done at once.

How to prove hell exists: try to get on an aeroplane

My wife and I arrived at Toronto airport a couple of weeks ago, knowing that the price one has to pay for a vacation is higher and more excruciating than merely parting with money.

The first obstacle that Air France mounted to prevent our boarding the flight was at the check-in counter:

Clerk: Madam, the name on your ticket is not that same as on your passport.
Me: (on my wife’s behalf). Yes it is, the passport just doesn’t have my wife’s middle name.
Clerk: But they must be identical or I cannot let you board.
Me: Well, what are we supposed to do now?
Clerk: Does your wife have any other identification with her middle name?
Me: We have my wife’s driver’s licence: it has an “L” for Louise on it.
Clerk – looking very doubtful: Very well, that will have to do. We’ll overlook it this time.
Me: (under my breath): &*^%

The second obstacle: Toronto airport security. The check-in clerk must have called ahead to alert the security staff that someone was on her way who had a middle name on her ticket but not on her passport and, therefore, was probably a terrorist. My wife was consequently groped and prodded in areas that hitherto had been my exclusive preserve – so she assures me. The groper was a woman, lessening the likelihood of inflaming  concupiscence through the squeezing of intimate body parts only slightly.

While this was occurring, a 300 pound Muslim lady waddled unmolested through security clad in a vast tent-like burka that could easily have concealed 100 pounds of gelignite.

On our way to Athens, we had to change planes in Charles De Gaulle airport, Paris. Our connecting flight was conveniently located at the opposite end of airport from where we landed, necessitating leaving the secure area and re-entering it at the furthest possible extremity of the building,

The Toronto Air France clerk clearly had taken her job very seriously and, in her zeal, called ahead to warn the security staff in Paris, too. My wife was probed once more in the same areas that had attracted so much attention in Toronto. I had to unpack a laptop, GPS, camera, chargers, book reader, lenses (me: “the lenses are glass”; French security maven: “mais non monsieur, zey have electroneecs”). Perhaps because I had tried to claim my camera lenses were just glass while knowing full-well they contained wires and chips, the security guard decided to subject me to the further humiliation of removing my trouser belt and making me shuffle through the metal detector with my pants sliding inexorably down my buttocks. I can’t be sure, but I think some of the female staff were snickering.

It took two hours to reach our connecting flight.

Resistance, of course, is futile. Any sign of reluctance would be met with orifice exploration and Tasers. Nevertheless, on returning to Toronto, I decided that some form of protest – mild enough to be mistaken for stupidity or eccentricity – was something from which I simply could not abstain.

I had contracted a mild cold on the last few days of our trip. By the time we were leaving it was mainly in my nose, so I spent most of the time on the way to Athens airport blowing the contents of my nasal cavity into paper tissues and, having nowhere else to put them, stuffing the used tissues into my pockets. It’s amazing how much material one nose can hold.

Having made me unpack my camera, lenses, laptop and so on, the Greek security guard uttered the words I had been anticipating: “empty your pockets, sir”.

Out came fifteen paper tissues in which were wrapped the bounty that my nose had manufactured overnight. As I held them three inches from the security guard’s face, I asked, “would you care to look through these?” “No, sir, put it back”. As I reached for my nose, the guard added – “in your pocket.” It wasn’t much, but it made me feel better.

Boxcutters on a plane

A few years back I found myself about to wander through airport security in Paris with a Swiss army knife in my pocket. I had meant to put it in my checked luggage, but had forgotten; groaning inwardly, I stuck it in a pocket of my carry-on bag.

After a ritual removing of my shoes, losing my pants through having to undo  my belt and being prodded in undignified places, I sailed through security – so did my Swiss army knife.

Sadly, a year or so later, I lost it to a paranoid Russian ex-commissar at the entrance to a museum in St. Petersburg.

The moral of the story is that you are more likely to be stabbed by a Swiss army knife on a plane than in a Russian museum.

From here:

Boxcutters on Flight From JFK — No, We’re Not Safer Than Before 9/11.

Recently a passenger brought box cutters through a passenger screening point and on to an airliner. In response to this, the Transportation Security Administration announced that the screeners responsible would get “remedial training.”

There’s been a lot of coverage of this event, including legitimate outrage that the sloppy TSA employees weren’t fired. What most people don’t realize is that tolerating failure and outright sloppy work has been a hallmark of U.S. aviation security from the beginning. The truth is nobody has ever been held accountable for aviation security failures – nobody. From top to bottom, the TSA arrogantly claims it does nothing wrong.

Canadian Air Transport Security Authority diligently tracking down terrorists

From here:Add an Image

After spending the Christmas holiday with family in Calgary, Elizabeth Strecker, 82, was flying back to her home in Abbotsford on Jan. 4 when she was selected for further screening by security officials and told to go through the full body scanner.

“One guy asked me if I had any liquids or gel on me and I said no,” said Strecker.

And that’s where the trouble started for the widow who immigrated to Canada from Germany nearly 60 years ago and lived in Calgary for 14 years before retiring to the B.C. city.

A cancer survivor, Strecker had a mastectomy five years ago and now wears a prosthetic breast — which is made of gel.

When she pointed that out to security officers, Strecker said she was accused of lying when first asked about liquids and gels.

“It was terribly, terribly embarrassing,” she said.

“It was really very humiliating.

“I’m an 82-year-old woman, not a terrorist.”

And that’s the problem: the 82 year old Elizabeth Strecker doesn’t look like a terrorist, so her prosthetic breast was an obvious target for probing. If CATSA only squeezed the prosthetic breasts of people who looked like terrorists, they could be accused not only of profiling, but of having common sense.

The last word on airport security

It is possible that full body scanners could be dangerous, particularly for frequent flyers; they may not even be particularly effective in detecting explosives. And no-body wants to be groped by airport security staff in a pat-down.

There is one exception, though: Canadian Liberal Leader, Michael Ignatieff, has declared, in a statement that, had George Bush said it, would be a headline in every tabloid in the Western World:

“If you’re in my business, you live in an airport. So I have people touching my private parts all day long”

Mr. Ignatieff has not yet clarified whether he lives in airports just for this particular experience, or whether he has a less important reason.