Pope vs Pelosi

From here:
It would appear from the two statements issued by the Vatican and the speaker’s office that Nancy Pelosi and Pope Benedict did not share the same views during her audience with the pontiff.

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi met Pope Benedict XVI at the Vatican Wednesday morning, but may not have had a meeting of the minds if the two statements from their offices are any indication.

No journalists were at the 15-minute encounter and the Vatican and the speaker’s offices have not released any photos. However, according to their statements it appears the pope and the politician attended two different get-togethers.

“His Holiness took the opportunity to speak of the requirements of the natural moral law and the Church’s consistent teaching on the dignity of human life from conception to natural death which enjoins all Catholics, and especially legislators, jurists and those responsible for the common good of society, to work in cooperation with all men and women of good will in creating a just system of laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of its development,” the Vatican wrote, having released the statement moments before the two met.

Several hours later, Pelosi’s office gave her take on the tete-a-tete.

“It is with great joy that my husband, Paul, and I met with his Holiness, Pope Benedict XVI today,” Pelosi said in a statement released hours after the meeting. “In our conversation, I had the opportunity to praise the Church’s leadership in fighting poverty, hunger and global warming, as well as the Holy Father’s dedication to religious freedom and his upcoming trip and message to Israel. I was proud to show his Holiness a photograph of my family’s papal visit in the 1950s, as well as a recent picture of our children and grandchildren.”

Nancy Pelosi, pro-abortion Catholic, evidently isn’t interested in the Pope’s views on protecting innocent life and, true to liberal form, is the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear, preferring to talk about less personally demanding topics such as world hunger and global warming. I wonder if she rode a bike to visit the Pope or flew in an aeroplane at taxpayer expense.

The Pope’s reference to “requirements of the natural moral law” as a defence for protecting unborn babies is interesting since it extends the principle of protecting the unborn – quite rightly – beyond Roman Catholicism to all who still believe in right and wrong: almost everyone on the planet with the possible exception of Anglicans.

The compassionate financing of Hamas

Remember this, when the BBC was excoriated by every right left thinking zealot for not broadcasting advertisements asking for aid for Gaza?

The BBC’s instincts were right:

The Robbing of Gaza

In a rare admission of Hamas’ wrong-doing, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (“UNRWA”) promptly condemned Hamas in a sternly worded press release for seizing its humanitarian supplies by force on February 3, 2009. For once, UNRWA did not deem it necessary, in the name of moral equivalency, to attack Israel at the same time.

The UN Secretary General’s deputy spokesperson Marie Okabe reinforced UNRWA’s condemnation of Hamas by essentially paraphrasing its press release at a briefing held on February 4th at UN headquarters that I attended. I looked around at other peoples’ faces in the briefing room and some appeared as surprised as I was that, for the first time, we were witnessing UNRWA and the Secretary General’s office actually criticizing Hamas alone in such strong terms. However, the matter-of-factness with which the Secretary General’s deputy spokesperson read her statement – as opposed to the anger we always hear from UN spokespersons whenever Israel is criticized – conveyed a rather nonchalant attitude toward the whole thing as if it were an unfortunate but isolated event. Of course it is anything but.

The incident that brought this development about involved the confiscation of over 3500 blankets and 406 food parcels by police affiliated with Hamas, who broke into an UNRWA warehouse in the Shatti beach refugee camp and seized the aid supplies by force. The supplies were to be distributed by UNRWA to five hundred families in Gaza. The confiscation took place after UNRWA staff had earlier refused to accede to Hamas’ demand and hand over the aid supplies to the Hamas-run Ministry of Social Affairs. The reason for the refusal, UNRWA said, was to ensure that the assistance would actually reach the intended beneficiaries.

Hamas wants total control over all aid – supplies and money – in order to enhance its claims to legitimacy and to bestow favors to its supporters in Gaza while depriving its enemies of any assistance.

Hamas has no interest in relieving the suffering of the civilians under its rule. In fact, Hamas prevented its own people from reaching lsraeli medical facilities set up just outside Gaza. It has regularly intercepted humanitarian convoys and stolen food items that had been donated for free distribution to needy Gazans. Instead, they were sold in the black market. After using Palestinian civilians as human shields during the conflict with Israel, Hamas is now stealing aid intended for suffering women and children whose images Hamas wants to continue using for propaganda purposes.

Another example of Hamas using its own people’s suffering to further its own evil ends – and how the West fell for it yet again.

Why Muddled Delusions Galore (MDGs) won't help

The Anglican church’s idea of ending poverty is to assemble a bunch of old people, many of them men in funny Add an Imagepurple dresses, and get them to hold up traffic by parading along a street waving meaningless placards. After their exertions, they naturally repair to a posh venue to gorge themselves on delicacies.

Anglicans will gather in Ottawa and New York on Thursday, Sept. 25, to renew their call for governments around the world to demonstrate their commitment to end global poverty and other social justice priorities outlined by the United Nations Millennium Development goals (MDGs).

This is how Anglicans plan on ushering in the New Jerusalem.

Allowing free trade is a different approach and, according to the National Post is one that actually helps the poor rather than merely increasing the already substantial girth of pot-bellied bishops.

More human beings have escaped poverty in the past 20 years than in any equivalent period in the history of the world.

Since 1990, China and India have pulled hundreds of millions of their people out of want. Their people eat better, live longer, and enjoy some measure of security. As they have prospered, they have in turn enriched the advanced world, selling us cheap goods and services and buying our food and technology.

Ominously, the anti-recession actions undertaken by the advanced countries may well aggravate the global trade collapse. The U.S. House of Representatives stuck a “Buy American” provision into its US$800-billion-plus stimulus package. The Senate has now extended the measure, with a requirement that “all manufactured goods” purchased with government money come from US suppliers. This protectionist amendment carries the strong backing of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

More than the dialogue that so fascinates Obama, what the world needs most is trade, more trade. It is up to him to champion it, for his own country’s sake, and the world’s.

I wonder when Rowan Williams will march for free trade? Shortly after taking a stand against the rampant heresies in the North American church, I expect.

Normal service will be resumed as soon as possible

In order to explain why everything is getting colder when we are supposed to be on the precipice of a global warming catastrophe, Al Gore has turned to Venus for inspiration.

Al Gore has a new argument for why carbon dioxide is the global warming boogeyman – and it’s simply out of this world.

Testifying last week before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee with yet another one of his infamous slide shows, Al Gore observed that the carbon dioxide (CO2) in Venus’ atmosphere supercharges the second-planet-from-the-sun’s greenhouse effect resulting in surface temperatures of about 870 degrees Fahrenheit. Gore added that it’s not Venus’ proximity to the Sun that makes the planet much warmer than the Earth because Mercury, which is even closer to the Sun, is cooler than Venus. Based on this rationale, then, Gore warned that we need to stop emitting CO2 into our own atmosphere.

In order to distract Anglicans worried about the disintegration of their church, Rowan Williams looks to global warming for inspiration:

On the evening of Feb. 3, the primates heard a presentation about global warming, in which the Most Rev. David Moxon, co-Presiding Bishop of the Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia, suggested lifestyle changes to address climate change, such as reducing travel and promoting eco-friendly congregations. “The church has biblical, practical and moral obligation to cut down carbon emissions,” he told the media Feb. 4.

Richard Dawkins, in order to explain how life can appear spontaneously from inert matter, posits the intervention of aliens, possibly the same ones causing the global warming on Venus.


To distract American taxpayers from the suspicion that the stimulus is largely bogus, Obama encourages green space exploration, presumably with the intention of assisting the Venusians currently imperilling their planet.

One theme in this bill is superfluous spending items coated with green sugar to make them more palatable. Both NASA and NOAA come in for appropriations that properly belong in the regular budget, but this spending apparently qualifies for the stimulus bill because part of the money from each allocation is reserved for climate-change research. For instance, the bill grants NASA $450 million, but it states that the agency must spend at least $200 million on “climate-research missions,” which raises the question: Is there global warming in space?

Normal service will resume when it gets a little warmer.

Stimulating the economy by not having babies.

Some of the money from the economic stimulus package is to fund family planning and contraception. From an ABC interview with Nancy Pelosi:

“The family planning services reduce cost,” Pelosi said, “One of the elements of this package is assistance to the states. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those – one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.”

“So no apologies for that?” I asked her.

“No apologies. No,” Pelosi said. “And this is a, to stimulate the economy,  is an economic recovery package and as we put it forth we have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy. Food stamps, unemployment insurance, some of the initiatives you just mentioned. Believe it or not, they’re the right thing to do but they also stimulate the economy.”

I can’t help thinking that this doesn’t live up the egalitarian pretensions of the Democrats. Exactly whose babies will not be born because of state-sponsored contraception? Not the babies of the wealthy or the middle class: they can afford their own rubbers. This is a program directed at the poor; and it may end up saving money since babies of poor families are more likely to need social assistance.

The idea that having babies should be discouraged for economic reasons is bad enough, but this is an attempt to discourage the poor from having babies. It is not a stimulus, but an exercise in social engineering and hypocrisy.

Fred Hiltz: let's investigate Israel.

Leftist Fred reveals his anti-Israel bias once more in this clap-trap from the PWRDF:fred-hitlz

Archbishop Fred Hiltz, Primate of the Anglican Church of Canada and The Right Rev. David Giuliano, Moderator of the United Church of Canada, have written  to Prime Minister Stephen Harper to request an independent investigation to the bombing of the Shaja ih Family Healthcare Centre in Gaza City on Jan 10, 2009.

One notes, with some amusement, that the PWRDF site has misspelled his name “Hitlz”; a Freudian slip, perhaps.

Sadly, it’s been corrected now. I did take a copy before the correction, though; you can see it on the right.

If Fred wants to investigate someone, how about the Hamas nut cases who train their children to become suicide bombers?

Giving Hiltz the benefit of the doubt for the moment by allowing that it is conceivable that he could be a ChristianAdd an Image, surely he should be able to see that motivation plays a part in what has happened in Gaza.

  • Israel wants to be left alone; Hamas fires rockets and calls for the destruction of Israel.
  • Israel wants to defend its civilian population, Hamas wants to use its population as a weapon.
  • Israel makes every attempt to avoid civilian casualties – even to the extent of warning civilians in target areas, Hamas deliberately targets civilians – even its own.
  • Israel accidentally bombs a clinic, Hamas rejoices at the propaganda opportunity.

As the Anglican Church of Canada disintegrates around him, Fred Hiltz can find little better to do than engage in political bigotry; pathetic.

Hitchens goes wobbly

Even cynical sots are not immune to Obama adoration disorder: Christopher is weak at the knees:

“We will restore science to its rightful place,” is intended, I have some reason to believe, to reinforce or underline the president’s emphasis on religious pluralism and on the inclusion (with a few days to go before the Darwin-Lincoln bicentennial) of the fast-growing number of “nonbelievers.” That this has already drawn fire from the vastly overrated black churches is a good sign in itself.

The president has a better grip on the English language than any of his living-memory predecessors, and it seems certain that he wrote at least 80 percent of this address himself. It’s nice to be able to hold people to claims that they have written rather than read, and I look forward to doing so.

Hitchens also has a better grip on the English language than most journalists; that doesn’t make what he says – however well he says it – correct; although he does get some things right, most notably Iraq.

Obama’s talk of “restoring science to its rightful place” would strike a religious chord in Hitchens even though science’s rightful place is really one of dependence on a metaphysic that Hitchens would deny.

Although  I had not pegged Hitchens as a nascent Obama apostle, it is a match made in Darwinian heaven: sterile, cringingly cool, conformist and devoid of significance.

My Man Jeeves

The class system in Britain is all but gone; which in some ways is a shame since it gave us Vanity Fair, The Eustace Add an ImageDiamonds, Brideshead Revisited and Bertie Wooster among other things.

Fear not, the spirit of Bertie Wooster and Reginald Jeeves lives on in the colonies: in the unlikely personas of Barack Obama and his tastelessly modernised, unimproved version of Jeeves,  Reggie Love.

Love is expected to shadow the President at all times, rarely straying more than a body length away from him during his waking hours.

It is Reggie who holds Mr Obama’s BlackBerry, dials the numbers on his mobile phone, briefs the White House chef on what the President would like for lunch and what he would like to drink.Add an Image

Every time Mr Obama leaves for a meeting, Reggie hands him his suit jacket and dabs any spots on his tie with a stain removal pen.

Until Reggie Love, bodymen tended to be regarded as glorified butlers, hired for their self-effacing manners and efficiency at managing their employers’ schedules.

Their most public job was handing out souvenir cufflinks engraved with the Presidential seal to White House visitors.

But Mr Obama promises to be a different kind of President – with a different kind of bodyman.

Reggie, who even the notably cool Mr Obama acknowledges is super-cool, has a suitably pithy phrase for his role. He is the White House Chief of Stuff.

The real Jeeves would, to his credit, not understand the concept of ‘cool’; but if he did, he would assiduously shun even the faintest hint of such an abomination.

Obama has acquired all the elitism of the British upper class while managing to avoid any vestige of its unassuming charm, humour and the humility bred from an  awareness of the intrinsic limitations of privilege.

The Berating of the Beeb

Update: Here are a couple of interesting perspectives from Melanie Phillips and Andrew Roberts.

On the face of it, sending aid to people in Gaza who need it must be a good thing, mustn’t it? The BBC – an organisation renowned for its leftist tilt on life – decided not to  broadcast a Gaza humanitarian appeal on the grounds that its reputation for impartiality would be dented. I’ll repeat that: its reputation for impartiality would be dented.

In fact, it appears that they did this for an entirely different, but nevertheless equally worthy reason: to annoy the play-socialist aristocrat, Tony Benn, one time BBC employee. Here Benn  denounces the BBC with weeping and gnashing of teeth:

Benn’s interviewer questioned whether the aid would actually reach its intended recipients or be diverted to Hamas; a nonplussed Anthony Wedgwood Benn characteristically ignored the question and started spouting propaganda. When pressed, he admited that money could end up going to Hamas – something that he would welcome considering his anti-Israel proclivities.

Those denouncing the BBC are legion, including, naturally, Rowan Williams.

All of which leads me to think that, for a change, the BBC might be doing something right.