Category Archives: homosexual marriage

Bishop of Buckingham says strange things about same-sex marriage

Posted on by
5

First, he seems to think that the Gospel – the Good News of Jesus Christ – is not so much the fact that we are reconciled to the Father through Jesus’ atoning sacrifice on the cross, but that Christianity, the Church, or indeed, God himself, places no restraint on our doing pretty much whatever we feel inclined to do – including marrying people of the same sex.

Second, forget all that “one flesh” nonsense, sex is not at the heart of marriage at all,  companionship is. That is why married couples are mainly celibate, a regrettable misunderstanding that lead to the extinction of the human race around 200,000 years ago.

Third, when we feel guilty, we needn’t repentant of what we’ve done that caused the guilt. All we have to do is attend an Anglican Church where the priest will infuse us with a gooey sensation of self-worth, assuring us that it’s fine to keep on doing what is making us feel guilty – particularly if it’s have gay sex; sorry, companionship.

From here:

Bishop of Buckingham the Rt Revd Dr Alan Wilson this week spoke at a debate on the issue at Kidlington’s St John’s Church.

A prominent supporter of gay marriage, he told worshippers at the Broadway church that the Christian tradition holds “the root of marriage is not sex but companionship”.

He said: “The idea that marriage is about friendship has become extremely powerful in England.”

Christians must symbolise “good news”, he said: “One of the really painful things I have had to learn is how the Church can be really bad news to people”.

This can “stir feelings of guilt and lack of self worth”, but he said: “God has made us like that. If he wanted to make us another way he would but he didn’t.”

Man and Superman. And Orson Scott Card

Posted on by
2

Orson Scott Card will be writing a story in the Adventures of Superman for DC Comics, a comic that The Comic Book Shoppe will not carry.

“Ottawa comic shop pulls books of anti-gay writer” blares the CBC headline. “’This is a man who wants to criminalize homosexuality,’ store owner says”.

Well, not quite.

Orson Scott Card is a Mormon, a writer of science fiction, and someone who believes gay marriage to be wrong. As the CBC article notes:

In a 1990 article for Sunstone Magazine, Card wrote an essay in which he said:

“Laws against homosexual behavior should remain on the books, not to be indiscriminately enforced against anyone who happens to be caught violating them, but to be used when necessary to send a clear message that those who flagrantly violate society’s regulation of sexual behavior cannot be permitted to remain as acceptable, equal citizens within that society.”

What the CBC fails to say is that Card subsequently changed his opinion and, while he still does not agree with gay marriage and homosexual activity, he does not now advocate its criminalisation.

Perhaps the CBC has been infiltrated by the aliens from Enders Game:  the journalists, rather than thinking for themselves, exhibit ant-like group behaviour, deriving herd consensus from the Jungian wilderness of an unconscious zeitgeist. Or maybe they are just daft.

Jimmy Carter supports gay marriage

Posted on by
3

He does this because ‘Jesus never said a word about homosexuality’. Jesus didn’t say a word about incest, bestiality or necrophilia either; by Carter’s measure, that would make them ‘very fine’.

From here:

Former President Jimmy Carter has said gay people should be allowed to marry in civil ceremonies, as ‘Jesus never said a word about homosexuality’.

The latest book by Mr Carter, now 87, entitled NIV Lessons from Life Bible: Personal Reflections with Jimmy Carter, encompasses his views on the Bible and on gay equality, among other issues. Discussing the book, he told the Huffington Post gay civil marriages were “very fine” in his view.

Mr Carter said: “Homosexuality was well known in the ancient world, well before Christ was born and Jesus never said a word about homosexuality. In all of his teachings about multiple things -– he never said that gay people should be condemned. I personally think it is very fine for gay people to be married in civil ceremonies.

 

Another nail in the marriage coffin

Posted on by
2

From here:

Saskatchewan’s highest court has ruled that marriage commissioners who are public servants cannot refuse to marry same-sex couples.

The decision by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal rejects two proposals from the provincial government that would allow some or all marriage commissioners to refuse to perform a service involving gay or lesbian partners if it offended their religious beliefs.

The government proposed that marriage commissioners who were employed before the law changed in 2004 could refuse to perform the services. It also proposed a second option where all marriage commissioners could refuse.

But the court noted that marriage commissioners are appointed by the government to perform non-religious ceremonies and are the only option for some same-sex couples seeking to tie the knot.

This decision has the unusual property of making sense and not making sense simultaneously.

It make sense because, from a secular perspective, once marriage has been redefined – and it has been – to mean just about anything you want it to mean, you cannot deny it to those who would have been outside its purview before redefinition. We shall see how long it takes for incestuous and polyamorous marriages to be accepted by the courts.

It makes no sense in the context of religion – which, after all, was the inventor of marriage – since all major religions define marriage as the union between one man and one woman. Western Anglicanism excepted, of course, but, then, it is no longer a major religion.

Homosexual marriage propaganda exploits children

Posted on by
2

It appears as if the makers of this video went out of their way to confirm in the minds of opponents of homosexual marriage, that they really are correct in their assessment that it sullies marriage, destroys families, threatens social cohesion and exposes children to abuse.

For advertising classes of the future, I can see it being preserved in digital aspic and occasionally paraded as a archetype of how not to influence people.