According to this, the only options are state funded abortion or coat hanger abortion.
What about giving birth to the baby instead of murdering it?
MoveOn.org’s coat hanger abortion ad
1
Category Archives: Abortion
Lethal injections: cruel for murderers, fine for babies
From here:
For the second time in three years, executions have been stopped in Tennessee as judges ponder whether supposedly benign lethal injections actually can cause excruciating pain…….
In lethal injections, a series of three chemicals is used — a barbiturate to make the inmate unconscious, a paralyzing agent to prevent seizures and involuntary gasps of pain, and finally a poison to stop the prisoner’s heart.
Sad to say, judges are not extending their agonising on the humanity of executing murderers by lethal injection to the similar execution of unborn babies – who don’t even merit the benefit of anaesthesia – by the ghouls of the abortion industry.
From here:
The abortion industry is certainly prolific in its ability to find new ways to destroy human life. And each “innovation” puts more women at risk.
Notorious abortionist, James Pendergraft, now performs a new method of late-term abortion in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area. The procedure is called a “fetal intra-cardiac injection.” Using a sonogram, the abortionist guides a spinal nettle through the woman’s abdomen into the unborn child’s heart and injects poison or air to stop the baby’s heart from beating. Once the abortionist kills the baby, he leaves the woman on her own to visit her personal doctor or a hospital emergency room to have the now-dead child delivered.
Like or Share this:
The most shocking 4-minute abortion debate you will ever see
From here:
CBR’s shocking, graphic video juxtaposed a soothing video produced by the Northland Family Planning Centers, a late-term abortion chain of 3 mills in Michigan, with the reality of abortion.
CBR’s video got such a huge initial response, CEO Gregg Cunningham decided to take some time to remaster it to grotesque perfection. CBR is calling this video “the most shocking 4-minute abortion debate you will ever see.” CBR may be right…
[flv:https://www.anglicansamizdat.net/wordpress/videos/abortionvideo.flv 700 500]
Like or Share this:
Obama continues to support murdering the unborn
From here:
President Obama reaffirmed his support for abortion rights on Saturday, the 38th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade that established a woman’s right to an abortion.
“I am committed to protecting this constitutional right,” Mr. Obama said in a statement. “I also remain committed to policies, initiatives, and programs that help prevent unintended pregnancies, support pregnant women and mothers, encourage healthy relationships, and promote adoption.”
Mr. Obama, the father of two young daughters, called on Americans to “recommit ourselves more broadly to ensuring that our daughters have the same rights, the same freedoms, and the same opportunities as our sons to fulfill [sic] their dreams.”
Mr. Obama said the 1973 Supreme Court ruling “affirms a fundamental principle: that government should not intrude on private family matters.”
What a pile of drivel.
Killing an unborn baby has nothing whatsoever to do with a person fulfilling his or her dreams: for sane married couples, having children is their dream and a career is the means of supporting the dream.
If killing an unborn child is a family matter upon which government should not intrude, infanticide would be too. Obviously this is rubbish since the government’s job is to restrain evil, particularly evil inflicted on the innocent and vulnerable. If anyone is thinking of saying that this makes me a socialist, don’t bother.
Like or Share this:
Flagitious abortion doctor charged with murder
“Pro choice” taken to it’s inevitable conclusion:
Like or Share this:
An Australian couple will abort twin boys because they want a girl
Children are no longer seen as gifts from God, bearing their creator’s image, but commodities to be picked through and discarded until a suitable specimen is found. This isn’t particularly surprising: it is one of the inevitable consequences of discarding Judeo-Christian ethics and replacing them with if it makes me feel good, it is good relativism.
From here:
A married couple who aborted twin boys the wife was expecting after IVF treatment have gone to court to choose the sex of their next child – because they want a girl.
The husband and wife already have three sons and said they now want to have a girl after their baby daughter died soon after birth.
They are both aged in their 30s and have taken their case to a legal tribunal after an independent medical body known as the Patient Review Panel rejected their bid to choose the gender of their next child using IVF.
The couple said they had made the decision to terminate the twin boys but could not continue to have unlimited numbers of children.
Like or Share this:
Abortion is endangering Europe more than al-Qaeda
According to the Duke of Kent’s son, Lord Nicholas Windsor.
From here:
Lord Nicholas, 40, who lost his place in the line of succession when he became a Roman Catholic, has written a controversial article in which he claims that abortion is a bigger threat to Europe than al-Qaeda and Islamic terrorism.
He describes abortion as “the single most grievous moral deficit in contemporary life” and calls for a “new abolitionism for Europe” in which abortion, like the slave trade, can be abolished.
While the threat of terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda calls for “robust and, where necessary, lethal response”, he claims in the American religious journal First Things that “these are not threats that appear existential and have not as yet provoked a real sense of public crisis”.
He has a point. Why worry so much about the external threat from a ramshackle collection of death-worshipping antediluvian barbarians when we are so intent on defeating ourselves by wiping out our successors before they are born.
Like or Share this:
Twin abortion
The latest revolting and callous abortion fad for a mother of twins is to abort one of them if having both is likely to be too much bother.
The preferred euphemism for this is “Selective reduction”.
From here:
Like so many other couples these days, the Toronto-area business executive and her husband put off having children for years as they built successful careers. Both parents were in their 40s — and their first son just over a year old — when this spring the woman became pregnant a second time. Seven weeks in, an ultrasound revealed the Burlington, Ont., resident was carrying twins. “It came as a complete shock,” said the mother, who asked not to be named. “We’re both career people. If we were going to have three children two years apart, someone else was going to be raising our kids. … All of a sudden our lives as we know them and as we like to lead them, are not going to happen.”
She soon discovered another option: Doctors could “reduce” the pregnancy from twins to a singleton through a little-known procedure that eliminates selected fetuses — and has become increasingly common in the past two decades amid a boom in the number of multiple pregnancies…..
“I’m absolutely sure I did the right thing,” she said. “I had read some online forums, people were speaking of grieving, feeling a sense of loss. I didn’t feel any of that. Not that I’m a cruel, bitter person … I just didn’t feel I would be able to care for (twins) in a way that I wanted to.”
Not cruel? What do you call this, then:
Fetal reductions are most commonly conducted by inserting an ultrasound-guided needle through the mother’s abdomen and into the uterus, injecting a potassium chloride solution into the chosen fetus or fetuses, stopping their hearts.
The “chosen fetus” is an interesting turn of phrase: two of our children – now adults – are twins. If “selective reduction” had been an option 30 years ago and their parents non compos mentis, which would have been the “chosen fetus”, I find myself wondering.
Like or Share this:
Voting for abortion at Birth or Not
Pete and Alisha Arnold have a website where you can vote for Alisha to give birth to her baby or abort her.
You can vote and choose whether we abort or keep our unborn child. For the first time, your vote on the topic of abortion can make a difference.
It’s not clear whether this is a publicity stunt by a pair or cranks or whether they really intend to make a decision based on the vote. It is certain that they are a pair of cranks and should put the baby – assuming that they are actually having one – up for adoption by people who know that a baby’s worth is intrinsic and not determined by a vote.
Like or Share this:
Killing babies for a living
From here:
A Nebraska doctor who is one of the few in the country to perform abortions late in a pregnancy said Wednesday that he would open new clinics in Iowa and the Washington area.
LeRoy Carhart said he decided to open the clinics because Nebraska had implemented a new law that made it illegal to perform abortions beyond the 20th week of a pregnancy. Only a handful of doctors perform abortions in late pregnancy, and Carhart has been the target of antiabortion protests. George Tiller, who was one of the few doctors who were public, was fatally shot by an antiabortion demonstrator while attending church in Wichita in 2009. Carhart said he worked with Tiller for 11 years.
How can a civilised society allow evil bastards like this to ply their murderous trade?
