But not a particularly funny one.
Some time ago an earnest young man knocked on my door to ask me if I would like to make a contribution to Amnesty International; and wouldn’t I like to see George Bush arrested when he arrived in Canada.
I rendered the hapless fellow speechless by informing him that Amnesty International was just beneath the Ku Klux Klan in the list of organisations to which I was likely to give money and that the only thing I really have against George Bush is that he didn’t waterboard enough terrorists.
I had to help the reeling cove back down my front steps.
From here:
As an organization, Amnesty International is hard to please. Very hard.
You thought your parents were demanding, your boss unreasonable and your spouse unrealistic? They’re the picture of tolerance next to Amnesty, buddy. On his best day ever, Jesus couldn’t please these people.
The latest report, issued Wednesday, makes clear that the world has let Amnesty down. Again. The world — yes, the whole thing, all seven billion of us — is a constant disappointment to the people at Amnesty International, who just can’t figure out why we can’t measure up to a few simple rules.
The United Nations is denounced as essentially useless because it hasn’t managed to halt the bloodshed in Syria. Canada is condemned because we didn’t arrest George W. Bush when we had the chance. It has no time for the United States, because it keeps using drones to kill terrorists, without asking permission. The raid that finally ended the life of Osama bin Laden was illegal. Israel is, as always, a favourite target, accused of continuing its brutal treatment of Palestinians, and imposing a “blockade” of Gaza and its 1.6 million residents. Mexico makes the list for failing to protect human rights in its war against drugs. Even Switzerland gets a cuffing for its treatment of asylum-seekers, especially a pair of Nigerians who were treated badly when they landed in the country.
Isn’t AI run by a Muslim, these days? Does AI ever object to gross infringements of human rights in Muslim states, or Islamist murders and mass killings? And don’t they support the promotion of the abotion megaholocaust – ie. aren’t they GROSS hypocrites? I think so. I see what you mean about “beneath the KKK …”
Just a foot note on waterboarding. The U.S. waterboarded just three (3) terrorists. The US military, as part of its “Escape and Evade” training, waterboarded thousands of its military and continues the practice to this day.
There’s something seriously wrong when a standard military technique is viewed one way for murdering terrorists and another way for sons and daughters serving their country. But isn’t that just like Progressives: two-faced.