Gandhi: non-violence and Vaseline

In much the same way as Leo Tolstoy, Gandhi promoted non-violence as a panacea for all strife, both personal and political. Although as a Christian it is easy to sympathise with the former, Gandhi’s formula only worked against the British Raj because, by the time Gandhi applied it, it also had little appetite for sustained violence.

The advice he gave to Jews, – a single Jew standing up and refusing to bow to Hitler’s decrees might be enough to melt Hitler’s heart – is nothing less than the fevered raving of a deranged mind.

It comes as no surprise, then, that a new biography of Gandhi reveals that his sexual antics were no less fevered and deranged.

No wonder Bishop Michael Ingham holds Gandhi up as a archetype worthy of emulation.

From here:

Gandhi’s pejorative reference to nakedness is ironic considering that, as Mr. Lelyveld details, when he was in his 70s and close to leading India to independence, he encouraged his 17-year-old great-niece, Manu, to be naked during her “nightly cuddles” with him. After sacking several long-standing and loyal members of his 100-strong personal entourage who might disapprove of this part of his spiritual quest, Gandhi began sleeping naked with Manu and other young women. He told a woman on one occasion: “Despite my best efforts, the organ remained aroused. It was an altogether strange and shameful experience.”

Yet he could also be vicious to Manu, whom he on one occasion forced to walk through a thick jungle where sexual assaults had occurred in order for her to retrieve a pumice stone that he liked to use on his feet. When she returned in tears, Gandhi “cackled” with laughter at her and said: “If some ruffian had carried you off and you had met your death courageously, my heart would have danced with joy.”

Yet as Mr. Lelyveld makes abundantly clear, Gandhi’s organ probably only rarely became aroused with his naked young ladies, because the love of his life was a German-Jewish architect and bodybuilder, Hermann Kallenbach, for whom Gandhi left his wife in 1908. “Your portrait (the only one) stands on my mantelpiece in my bedroom,” he wrote to Kallenbach. “The mantelpiece is opposite to the bed.” For some reason, cotton wool and Vaseline were “a constant reminder” of Kallenbach, which Mr. Lelyveld believes might relate to the enemas Gandhi gave himself, although there could be other, less generous, explanations.

Gandhi wrote to Kallenbach about “how completely you have taken possession of my body. This is slavery with a vengeance.” Gandhi nicknamed himself “Upper House” and Kallenbach “Lower House,” and he made Lower House promise not to “look lustfully upon any woman.” The two then pledged “more love, and yet more love . . . such love as they hope the world has not yet seen.”

Thousands of Christians displaced in Ethiopia after Islamists set fire to churches and homes

From here:

Thousands of Christians have been forced to flee their homes in Western Ethiopia after Muslim extremists set fire to roughly 50 churches and dozens of Christian homes.

At least one Christian has been killed, many more have been injured and anywhere from 3,000 to 10,000 have been displaced in the attacks that began March 2 after a Christian in the community of Asendabo was accused of desecrating the Koran.

In the midst of all this terrorising of Christians by Muslims, there is at least some good news: only one Koran has been damaged – and even that appears inconclusive.

World leaders won’t have to write notes imploring copy-cat desecrators to show more sensitivity to Koran lovers, the heads of bishops and archbishops won’t implode as they contemplate the enormity of possible hate crimes against the Koran and, something we can all be thankful for, Obama won’t make another speech about how, in this teachable moment, Christians should show restraint so as not to inflame worldwide Islamophobia.

Don’t Ask Don’t Tell and the kissing Marines

From here:

Four branches of the military have begun sending training material to 2.2 million active and reserve troops as a prelude to opening the ranks to gays, with instructions on, for example, what to do if an officer sees two male Marines kissing in a shopping mall…..

The vignette about seeing two male Marines kissing is part of a list of scenarios to help instructors prepare commanders for incidents likely to arise.

“Situation,” it begins. “You are the Executive Officer of your unit. While shopping at the local mall over the weekend, you observe two junior male Marines in appropriate civilian attire assigned to your unit kissing and hugging in the food court.

“Issue: Standards of Conduct. Is this within standards of personal and professional conduct?”

The answer to Marines: “If the observed behavior crosses acceptable boundaries as defined in the standards of conduct for your unit and the Marine Corps, then an appropriate correction should be made. Your assessment should be made without regard to sexual orientation.”

Wrong answer: you should video the kissing marines. The video would then be used as propaganda material to demoralise the enemy by showing them how tough US Marines are.

 

TEC North

The Rev. Canon Gordon Baker is suggesting that the Anglican Church of Canada changes its name. He is not proposing to take the obvious and needed step to avoid prosecution under the false advertising act:  remove the word “Church”. Instead he wants to align with the other sinking ship south of the border, The Episcopal Church. In the popular vernacular, I think it means Fred would become Katharine’s bitch – assuming he isn’t already.

From here:

So I raise the question, “Is it time for a name change from The Anglican Church of Canada?” After all, we changed it once before, in 1955, from The Church of England in Canada to The Anglican Church of Canada. This was done to recognize and proclaim our existence and autonomy as something other than a colonial religious outpost. However appropriate the use of the word “Anglican” was at that time, it is now more than 50 years later, and our church has changed in its understanding of itself and its mission in a greatly changed Canadian social context.

Today we are developing new mature relationships with the aboriginal peoples of Canada and they are our sisters and brothers in faith and mission. Our clergy in Quebec are becoming totally bilingual so as to work comfortably within a French culture. The tag in western Canada of being the “English Church” no longer holds true.

I submit that it is time for us to be fully grown up and give thanks for all we have received from the Church of England, and others, but have a name that more truly expresses who we are. I believe that the name, “The Episcopal Church of Canada,” would do just that.

 

Wuthering blanking Heights

From here:

BBC Radio 3 is to broadcast an adaptation of Wuthering Heights containing a number of strong expletives, with Cathy and Heathcliff both using the f-word, Radio Times can disclose.

Adapted from Emily Brontë’s novel by playwright and theatre director Jonathan Holloway, the new 90-minute production – which airs at 8pm on Sunday (27 March) – will portray the much-loved characters as listeners have never heard them before.

Although Holloway admits the addition of swearing to his production may raise some eyebrows, he argues that an element of shock is integral to Brontë’s story of love on the Yorkshire moors.

What, I wonder, could be less shocking than the f-word on the BBC?

 

The Rowan Hood tax

Rowan Hood, Rowan Hood, going round the bend;
Rowan Hood, Rowan Hood, with his band of men persons.
Loathed by the bad, loathed by the good:
Rowan Hood. Misunderstood, Rowan Hood.

From here:

The Archbishop of Canterbury has repeated calls for a “Robin Hood” tax to be imposed on financial transactions as he spoke of the “acute” dangers of “paralysing” the voluntary sector through heavy public spending cuts.

Dr Rowan Williams said a tax of 0.05% on transactions in currency, stocks and derivatives between major financial institutions – and not High Street banks – could generate £20 billion a year for the UK.

The money would then be divided between domestic public services and international development projects, he said in a speech in London on the Big Society vision, first outlined by David Cameron.

“On its own, this idea might too easily be taken for another variety of ‘stateist’ problem-solving – but united to a coherent programme of capacity-building in local communities, here and worldwide … it still has the potential to deal effectively with the acute current dangers of paralysing the voluntary sector through heavy cuts in their public budgetary support,” he told an audience at King’s College.

 

Changing Christopher Hitchens' mind

Try as I might, I can’t dislike Christopher Hitchens as much as I think I should.

At the very end of the following interview, when asked whether any evidence could change his mind about God’s existence, he concedes that, although none has yet, it is not impossible that some could appear that would.

This admission is refreshingly honest and brings him closer to agnosticism than atheism; perhaps we are seeing a mind concentrated by its imminent demise.

Bishop Michael Ingham explains natural disasters

I admit that explaining the existence of evil from a Christian perspective isn’t that easy. But, although even the best attempts tend to leave some loose ends and intellectual explanations are not necessarily emotionally consoling, Michael Ingham has not brought the Christian understanding of evil to new heights in his musings on the Japanese tragedies.

According to Ingham: “Natural evil is the result of things over which we have no control” and “We call them evil because they are evil” and “Natural evil is random. It is not planned”.  Eat your heart out, Thomas Aquinas.

From here:

Bishop Michael Ingham told the audience that disasters such as the earthquake and tsunami in Japan are examples of “natural evil,” which happen randomly and can’t be explained by any divine plan.

“Natural evil is the result of things over which we have no control — earthquakes, tsunamis,” Ingham said during the 90-minute service.

“We call them evil because they are evil. They wreak havoc upon the innocent and the defenceless. … Natural evil is random. It is not planned. It afflicts us without reason and without human deserving.”

In the face of such unspeakable horror, Ingham said, the world must come together as a community of neighbours.

“We must cultivate the virtue of compassion,” said Ingham. “We cannot survive as isolated individuals or isolated societies. The pain of our neighbours is our pain. When neighbours suffer, neighbours respond.”

Has Ingham said anything the Humanist Canada society might not have said? No.